Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
Double-parked delivery vehicles, cars on red curbs and vehicles blocking driveways are not uncommon sights in Mountain View. The parking violations are a safety hazard and public nuisance, but they also underscore another problem in the city – namely that the demand for on-street parking in parts of the city exceeds available spaces.
The City Council took steps to address this issue on Tuesday evening in a study session that reviewed the city’s street parking regulations.
“I do think that it’s good that we’re looking at this. We’re facing really a sea change in terms of parking,” Council member Alison Hicks said at the June 11 meeting.
Certain trends are making on-street parking more difficult to accommodate in Mountain View. This includes state laws that say cities can’t require developers to provide parking near public transit and new street designs that reduce the number of parking spots, as well as high-density housing and single occupancy vehicle use that put more pressure on already limited spaces.
Ultimately, the council recommended that the city investigate a residential permit parking program, even though one has been on the books since 2016. It has just never been implemented. They also supported the possibility of paid street parking, which has been considered in the past too.
But at the top of their discussion was the issue of parking enforcement – something that the report did not explicitly address.
“To me, this staff report was basically parking regulation 101, and I felt like it was really good to get us all on the same page and to educate us,” Mayor Pat Showalter said. “One of the things that I noticed, however, is that this review was silent on enforcement.”
Mountain View Police Chief Mike Canfield addressed some of these concerns, noting that patrol officers and community service officers respond to parking violation complaints when reported. They also proactively enforce regulations, primarily in the downtown area.
“But it’s a big city and there are vehicles everywhere,” Canfield said, adding that the police can’t monitor every type of parking violation with its current staffing levels.
While council members supported more consistent police enforcement, they also were in favor of other parking management strategies, like updating Mountain View’s residential permit parking program.
The idea behind the program is that it would provide relief for neighborhoods that experience overflow parking from nearby commercial, transit or school areas, said Senior Traffic Engineer Carla Ochoa, who presented the report to the council.
Under the program, designated areas would have time limits on parking, with an exemption for vehicles with parking permits – though it would not necessarily guarantee a spot if no on-street parking is available, Ochoa said.
So far, there has not been enough community interest in a specific neighborhood for the residential permit program to get off the ground. Council members questioned why this was the case, with Hicks commenting that the program could possibly work better if it was initiated by the city and not residents.
“I think one of the problems that we’ve had is we are mostly asking residents to arrange that. And if it’s a tool for making our active transportation plan or our downtown or our village centers function, then it shouldn’t be up to the residents to initiate,” she said.
Council member Ellen Kamei expressed support for a residential permit program in Mountain View that potentially could be used alongside other parking management strategies, like meters or paid lots, similar to what has been implemented in Palo Alto, Redwood City and San Mateo.
“In my mind, enforcement is not just the police department, but enforcement can also be paying for parking,” Kamei said, adding that it was problematic for the city to have a residential permit program that has never been implemented. “Nobody has successfully petitioned (for it), and I’m curious, is it because there isn’t anything else helping lead it to success?” she asked.
Hicks expressed ambivalence at the idea of paid or metered parking, particularly in the downtown area, noting that it could possibly deter people from visiting if they could go elsewhere for free.
Council member Lisa Matichak also raised questions about the success of the city’s transportation demand management strategies, which aims to incentivize residents and employees to use alternative and sustainable transportation options.
Referring directly to the council report, Matichak noted that the strategies “do not offset parking demand to the extent that may be required to avoid street parking impacts,” and encouraged the city to have more realistic assumptions about what could be achieved.
Council members also encouraged more education and community outreach to better inform the public about Mountain View’s parking regulations, which could help ease some of the parking problems seen on the streets.
“I’m going to assume people maybe just don’t know as opposed to just ignoring (the parking rules). So maybe not just education on the new laws, but education on the existing laws would be helpful,” Matichak said.
Paid parking downtown would hurt the already struggling businesses. Most of the surrounding cities have a lot of free parking.
Residential permit parking would be helpful as we have folks coming from other neighborhoods to park on our streets.
The police department forgot to conveniently report that according to a community meeting I heard, they are issuing 6000 tickets a year, down from 18,000 pre pandemic. Not sure what else the ‘traffic’ unit is doing besides writing accident reports
Re: enforcement, why isn’t the City investing in a few mobile Automatic License Plate Readers? MVPD should be able to patrol most of Mountain View every week and automatically send tickets for each time limit, bike lane or sidewalk parking violation. That’s how Palo Alto enforces its RPPs. Invest in self driving vehicles to further cut costs.
I think the council should compare the cost of implementing paid parking with the cost of increasing enforcement. I’m guessing one FTE for parking enforcement would cost less than installing parking meters everywhere.
Not surprising that community interest on this topic is low. We do not have much of a parking problem in downtown, or anywhere in Mountain View for that matter. I live around the corner from the library and there is not a problem here. Having sporadic traffic is a small negative that comes with all the benefits of living near the ‘city center’. Rarely is the parking lot behind the B of A building ever full. This is not a problem worth our time.
Paid parking and permit parking are bad ideas, MV downtown just isn’t that interesting or unique enough to add another expense. As others are pointing out, we’ll just go somewhere else even though many live in MV.
Public transit doesn’t work for families with small children, period, nothing the city do will ever change that. In fact the city seems to go out of their way to make it worse. Oh there is a parking problem, lets make downtown walk-able and close off street parking, absolutely shocking businesses closed, who could have predicted that?
Next, lets take the cities best overflow parking lot (Mercy/California) and turn it into affordable housing and like others new complexes, lets shortchange the parking stalls on these new apartments to further push public transportation. You know, new residents, wont get cars then and all will be happy. Sure, those suckers with small children that just want to use the library will be out, since the library lots will now be always full. I realize I’m making a bad assumption you can even get to those spots because they are being blocked on the streets by the new apartment complex traffic like moving vans, package delivery trucks, car carriers, construction trucks (along with their nails & screws crumb trails), apartment maintenance trucks, Uber/Lift drivers, and people who simply waiting for a spot and feel its Ok to block everyone on the street to do it.
I particularly like the SRB comment / do what is shown to work locally.
The Beatles solution: “lovely Rita, meter maid, what would We Do without you? and meter guys also. Electric motorization!
It makes me angry that, for years now, the City Council has been approving housing projects downtown with little to no parking included, with the comment that this will supposedly discourage car ownership. And then, when these residents end up parking on the street, the Council discovers that their short-sighted strategy has backfired. This outcome was entirely predictable! Let’s not “fix” it by restricting street parking to residents. Street parking should be made available for visitors to downtown businesses and events—or our downtown will die.
There does not HAVE to B just surface lots (4 parking) Right? Or is my old vision failing me? Take a look at the Muti-story lot / retail on bottom, solar /shade panels on top, that is at this downtown corner.
In the R1 areas / not really a PROBLEM, just sometimes a problem.
Bryant near Villa. (Google Map view)
https://www.google.com/maps/@37.39451,-122.0796564,143m/data=!3m1!1e3?entry=ttu
Bryant at California public parking (retail + solar)
Google Street View
https://www.google.com/maps/@37.3918475,-122.0817864,3a,75y,80.67h,100.81t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sMWIrs_hYaJzMhAI7DFA_vw!2e0!6shttps:%2F%2Fstreetviewpixels-pa.googleapis.com%2Fv1%2Fthumbnail%3Fpanoid%3DMWIrs_hYaJzMhAI7DFA_vw%26cb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile.gps%26w%3D203%26h%3D100%26yaw%3D13.370444%26pitch%3D0%26thumbfov%3D100!7i16384!8i8192?coh=205409&entry=ttu
“déjà vu” all over again….in a time not that long ago….
OMV residents, The Downtown Parking Committee (OMV residents), The City Council (Omv residents) proposed a RPP program for Single Family Dwellers, excluding apartment dwellers, condo dwellers and PUD’s dwellers (Planned Unit Developments), knowing more more parking permits would be have to be issued than street parking would be available should the proposal fail. Well it failed. The CA courts determined the proposal was discriminatory on its face and subsequently not pursued.
Here we go again, the solution was straight forward back then. Establish 2 hour parking restrictions and abide by the daytime parking restrictions for all types of dwellers. Restrictions would be 9am -5pm M-F. The program was not pursued because the goal of parking permits for only single family home permits was not achieved.
Parking within your property line, abide by the newly established time restricted signs is the solution that would allow for easier overnight street parking for all dwellers and allow for more visitors to support Mountain View during the day and early evening.